Advancing the Interests of Authors Who Want to Serve the Public Good
Bartz v. Anthropic: What are some additional takeaways and where do things go from here?
AI generated image inspired by Alsup’s opinion. A judge reflects quietly as his mind overflows with the creative output of young students—books, art, and ideas born from learning, curiosity, and the freedom to create. In an earlier post, we shared details from Judge Alsup’s decision on Anthropic’s motion for summary…
We welcome authors and creators of all kinds and all nationalities who share our mission and are committed to having their work be read, seen, and heard. Our members include writers of fiction and nonfiction, poets, researchers, and journalists.
Subscribe for our latest news and analysis on law, policy, and authorship for the public good.
The Latest
An Updated NIH and Publisher Guidance: What Authors Need to Know about NIH’s Public Access Policy
The Author-Library Alliance: Supporting Fair eBook Legislation Together
Anthropic Wins on Fair Use for Training its LLMs; Loses on Building a “Central Library” of Pirated Books
Yesterday, Judge Alsup released his decision on Anthropic’s motion for summary judgment in the fast-moving lawsuit it is defending, brought by three book authors on behalf of a class of millions objecting to Anthropic’s use of books for training its LLMs. We’ve recently posted about other aspects of the case…