Advancing the Interests of Authors Who Want to Serve the Public Good
The 1976 Act Could Have Been Very Different
Copyright lawyers, whether they are practitioners or academics, treat the Copyright Act of 1976 as if it were a sacred text. To a certain extent, we do so because we have internalized the great deference federal courts generally show to all acts of Congress. The courts give acts of Congress a presumption of legitimacy. The courts assume Congress knew what it was doing when passed a law, and it is not the courts’ role to second guess Congress’s policy judgments or motivations or competence. Moreover, as the Supreme Court teaches, they must “give effect, if possible, to every clause and…
We welcome authors and creators of all kinds and all nationalities who share our mission and are committed to having their work be read, seen, and heard. Our members include writers of fiction and nonfiction, poets, researchers, and journalists.
Subscribe for our latest news and analysis on law, policy, and authorship for the public good.
The Latest
Bartz v. Anthropic Fairness Hearing: Observations and Takeaways
The fairness hearing in Bartz v. Anthropic took place this afternoon, Thursday, May 14, 2026, before Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín in the Northern District of California….
Bartz v. Anthropic Fairness Hearing: Final Reminder, 91.3% Claims Rate, and updates from the Docket
A copy of part of the settlement notice sent out to class members The fairness hearing in Bartz v. Anthropic is set for today, Thursday,…
Authors Alliance Backs Illinois HB5236 and the Broader State Ebook Licensing Effort
Authors Alliance is pleased to announce our collaboration with the eBook Study Group on a joint statement supporting Illinois HB5236, the Digital Library Protection Act,…
