Anthropic Wins on Fair Use for Training its LLMs; Loses on Building a “Central Library” of Pirated Books
Yesterday, Judge Alsup released his decision on Anthropic’s motion for summary judgment in the fast-moving lawsuit it is defending, brought […]
Yesterday, Judge Alsup released his decision on Anthropic’s motion for summary judgment in the fast-moving lawsuit it is defending, brought […]
As the high‑profile copyright lawsuits against AI companies proceed, the courtroom drama captures headlines. But I’ve long thought that settlement may be the real outcome to watch.
We may already be entering “settlement watch” territory in one of the fastest-moving AI cases, Bartz v. Anthropic.
Back in October, I asked a simple but unresolved question: “Who represents you in the AI copyright suits?” Now, eight months later, we’re getting closer to an answer—at least for some authors. In Bartz v. Anthropic, one of the fastest-moving lawsuits over the use of copyrighted works to train generative AI systems, the plaintiffs have asked the court to certify a class of authors whose books were allegedly copied without permission.
We’ve received many questions from authors, librarians, and research administrators about the NIH decision to accelerate implementation of its public
[Update On September 10, the D.C. Circuit granted Perlmutter’s request for an injunction pending appeal, reinstating her as Register of
The last few days have been quite dramatic for anyone paying attention to copyright law and policy. The Generative AI
Last night a number of news outlets reported that President Trump had fired the Librarian of Congress, Carla Hayden. This
Below is an interview with Charles Watkinson, Director of the University of Michigan Press and Associate University Librarian for Publishing
This is a post authored by Maria Crusey, an intern with Authors Alliance and a third-year law student at Washington
We’ve heard from lots of authors with questions about AI licensing of their works by their publishers. Cambridge University Press