Category Archives: Blog

Caged Masterpieces: Chris Hoofnagle Reviews Arthur Leff’s Swindling and Selling

Posted July 20, 2015

Imagine yourself tracking down a citation, constructing a syllabus, pursuing an intriguing research topic, or reading up on a favorite subject. You’ve organized your materials, refined your ideas, and are busily tracking down and collecting sources. Everything is falling into place, until you realize with a sinking feeling that a book on your list is out of print.  A few minutes of online research reveals that used copies are prohibitively expensive. The public library holds no copies, and, even for those with access to a university library system, the nearest copy is housed in an off-campus storage facility hundreds of miles away. The book you need (which has suddenly become of utmost importance to your entire project) could very well be a “caged masterpiece”—accessible in a very limited way, but out of reach to a wider audience in the valley of the unassignable.

One example among many such works is Swindling and Selling, by the late Arthur Leff. Despite its continued utility and relevance to the study of consumer protection, the book remains inaccessible to readers who lack access to a major research library, or to the funds necessary to purchase a relatively rare used copy. In the review below, Authors Alliance founding member Chris Jay Hoofnagle, director of the Berkeley Center for Law & Technology’s information privacy programs and senior fellow to the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic, reviews this out-of-print book that is, for all intents and purposes, unavailable to scholars, lawyers, students, and the public: a caged masterpiece.

Arthur Leff’s Swindling and Selling is a classic, wry analysis of the blurry lines between what we consider honest salesmanship and illegal fraud. Not all selling is swindling, but all swindling is selling, Leff explains. He shows how both sellers and swindlers have to overcome similar forms of buyer resistance. Leff explains these dynamics in the language of Erving Goffman and through some use of behavioral economics.

In the case of swindling, con artists weave a dramaturgy where they hold a monopoly over some valuable asset, and the mark is set up as monopsonist, an exclusive buyer with access to a special deal. The scheme is premised on mutual need, and policing of these schemes is difficult because for part of the transaction, the mark is a willing participant. Here, Leff describes scams such as the “Spanish Prisoner,” where a mark is promised great riches if he will only bribe some minor official to free the holder of the treasure (the modern version of this includes the “419” scheme). Leff then pans out to show how the elements of swindling are present in some political and religious movements (although these may not be scams). The “ancient estate” scam, where marks are convinced that a fantastic old property was improperly distributed, making many modern-day people claimants to it, is similar to political movements to repatriate lands. “Godcons” are con games where the “conman…induces one or more marks to trade money…of this world value in exchange for the promised delivery of quantities of exceedingly valuable divinely manufactured goods.” Pyramid schemes operate by distracting marks from the opportunity costs of their labor, and by getting them emotionally attached to a swindle instead of more viable employment.

Leff’s analysis shines when he switches from an entertaining series of examples of “bunco” to legal selling. In a perfect market, bargains should not exist. Thus, sellers must create a plausible dramaturgy to explain why a buyer gets a bargain. This could be a clearance sale, with praises the buyer as parsimonious while implying that less careful consumers are getting the anti-bargain. Leff then turns to mass advertising, which relies upon several predicable cons: the “sufficiency switch” and the “Calvinist causation.” The former refers to the many products that suggest some cause and effect between the purchase of a product and some goal—clear up one’s complexion with a skin cream and get the girl. The latter is Leff’s term for positional objects: the Cadillac or the Mercedes. These things operate from an opposite logic. They do not make one successful, they license a script (and a prop) to the mark: “Buy this symbol with which you can advertise, powerfully and convincingly, that you are what you, and those about whose opinions you care, devoutly wish to be.”

This wonderful book is out of print, and practically unavailable to new generations of lawyers and thinkers who focus on consumer protection. As of this writing, the least expensive used copy of it is $74 on Amazon.com. The entire University of California library system has only two copies of this work. According to Google Scholar, despite Leff’s brilliance and masterful discussion, the book has only attracted 27 citations.


Countless works of enduring value and significance fall out of print and remain essentially off-limits, which not only denies their creators an intellectual legacy, but also stymies researchers, libraries, artists, and others whose work could be enriched by access.  A treasure trove of creative, historical, and cultural output languishes in this informational no man’s land, and the power of these works to inform, educate, and enlighten is greatly diminished.

Authors Alliance is deeply committed to the belief that these “caged masterpieces” deserve to be widely read. To that end, we are creating a series of examples to highlight them. We want to hear from you about works that are valuable, interesting, relevant—and out of reach. We invite you to contact us at info@authorsalliance.org and nominate more “caged masterpieces” to be featured in this space. And to all authors whose own books might be locked away out of sight, we encourage you to take action and you recover the rights to your work in order to give it new life.

Rights Reversion Effort Continues with Mellon Foundation Support

Posted July 14, 2015

Authors Alliance is pleased to announce that work on our Rights Reversion project is moving full speed ahead thanks to a grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. In April, we released our guide to rights reversions, and are continuing our efforts to help authors understand and manage the rights necessary to make their works broadly available now and in the future. “The Mellon Foundation is instrumental in supporting the dissemination and preservation of work of scholarly, cultural, and historical significance,” says Executive Director Mike Wolfe. “This funding will enable us to continue our outreach and advocacy efforts to ensure that authors are empowered to see that their intellectual legacies remain accessible beyond the commercial lives of their books.”

The grant will enable Authors Alliance to host a series of four workshops in Ann Arbor, New York City, Los Angeles, and in North Carolina’s Research Triangle. We also plan to release additional resources to support authors who are seeking and implementing rights reversions, including further guidance on how authors might best disseminate their pre-digital works after securing a reversion of rights, and are dedicating resources to provide direct assistance to authors seeking advice on the rights reversion process.

Full details on our complete lineup of events and workshops will be posted as soon as our schedule is finalized. In the meantime, Authors Alliance members and other authors looking for further guidance on the rights reversion process should send their inquiries to reversions@authorsalliance.org.

Authors Alliance Welcomes Erika Wilson as Communications and Operations Manager

Posted June 29, 2015

Authors Alliance is pleased to welcome Erika Wilson as our new Communications and Operations Manager. Erika comes to us with a solid background in authors’ rights and IP issues thanks to her most recent position at the California Digital Library, and looks forward to helping to shape the future of Authors Alliance. “As we continue to grow, it’s important we have staff committed to our mission,” said Authors Alliance Executive Director Michael Wolfe. “Erika’s talent and drive are a much-needed addition to our team and we could not be more thrilled to have her on board.”

Erika holds an MA in English literature, and is a voracious reader. Please join us in welcoming Erika to our team!

Thoughts on the Copyright Office Report and Orphan Works

Posted June 18, 2015

Authors Alliance Co-Founder Pamela Samuelson

The Copyright Office report on Orphan Works and Mass Digitization is an important step in the long road toward resolving the orphan works problem and seeing more of our cultural and intellectual heritage made accessible to the public and to authors who want to build upon this heritage.

Authors Alliance commends the Copyright Office for the serious attention it has given to this issue. We were glad to see that the Office regards the orphan work problem as “widespread and significant” and in need of policy resolution. We commend the Office for endorsing that the orphan work solution should apply to all types of works, all types of uses, and all types of users. We were pleased also to see that the Office accepts that fair use is and should be part of the solution to this problem and that the limitation on liability approach the Office proposes can co-exist with fair use as a solution to the orphan works problem in the United States.

Nevertheless, I am left with three reservations about the proposal: First, the Office proposes to condition eligibility for the limitation on liability approach on the user’s filing a very detailed notice of intent to use with the Copyright Office, which must include a description of the search conducted for the rights holder as well as what the intended uses are before any uses have been made. This may not be unduly cumbersome for major copyright industry firms, but for individual authors, particularly those whose motivation to write is more focused on contributing to knowledge than to make a lot of money, the notice-of-intent-to-use may be too difficult to comply with, particularly if the number of orphans that, say, an historian or anthropologist might want to use is substantial and if the exact nature of the uses have yet to be determined. The Office’s 2006 report did not include the notice-of-intent-to-use requirement.

Second, we should be concerned with the central role that the Office intends to play in developing standards for diligent searches for rights holders. Given the wide variety of works, users and uses that will be affected by the proposal, a one-size-fits-all search standard set by the Office may not provide the flexibility that would be desirable. Of course, a diligent search for rights holders should be required, and those who undertake lame searches should not qualify for limits on liability, but searches should be reasonable in light of the circumstances. A major motion picture studio that wants to make a movie of an orphaned short story should have to make a more rigorous search than an academic author who wants to use orphan works in a research project.

Third, it was disappointing that the Office was somewhat skeptical about the utility of codes of best practices for making fair uses of orphan works. These codes have been adopted through a rigorous and conscientious community processes, and provide greater guidance about fair use than can be had simply by studying the fair use case law.

Tackling problems of this scale is far from easy, but I am hopeful that, with the participation of Authors Alliance and other stakeholders, a fair and viable solution will not prove too far off.

Authors Alliance and the Copyright Office Report on Orphan Works and Mass Digitization

Posted

Earlier this month the Copyright Office released its report on Orphan Works and Mass Digitization. Both of these topics are of special interest to Authors Alliance. We have taken public stands in the past to support mass digitization projects, like those at HathiTrust and Google Books that advance our members’ interest in having their works preserved, made searchable, and made accessible to the print-disabled. And we’re eager to see a solution to the orphan works problem that keeps so much of our cultural and intellectual heritage—even our own works—from participating fully in contemporary culture.

While Authors Alliance commends the serious attention and thought the Copyright Office has given these issues, we have some reservations about its reasoning and its proposed solutions. We will stay involved as these issues continue to work their way through the government, and will be filing a comment in response to the Copyright Office’s related inquiry regarding its proposed “pilot program” for licensing mass digitization projects. Our involvement will be particularly directed toward seeing that the following principles are adequately considered:

  1. We need approachable solutions that anyone can understand and use.
  2. Any solution for these problems must adequately take into account the diversity of author and rights holder interests when it comes to uses of their work. For many authors, and in particular for many Authors Alliance members, the best outcome is one that ensures their ability to take advantage of new avenues for reaching readers, especially when their preference is to do so under an open access license.
  3. Solutions must not prejudice fair use rights.

Stay tuned as we will continue to post updates and further thoughts on the Report here on the Authors Alliance blog.

Recapping the 1201 DMCA Exemption Hearings

Posted May 29, 2015

We have blogged several times about Authors Alliance’s effort to obtain an exemption to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that will preserve authors’ right to make fair use in the digital age.

Yesterday, our team testified in support of this effort at a hearing at the Library of Congress in Washington, DC. Authors Alliance Executive Director Michael Wolfe was joined by noted film scholar Bobette Buster and representatives from the Intellectual Property, Arts, and Technology Clinic at University of California, Irvine School of Law and the Samuelson-Glushko Technology Law & Policy Clinic at University of Colorado School of Law.

The exemption, which we explain in greater detail here and here, would protect the fair use rights of e-book authors, allowing them to bypass the encryption on DVDs, Blu-ray, and other media in order to use film clips in multimedia e-books. This would be a renewal and modification of a more limited exemption that was granted in 2012 and will expire this fall. Unlike the current rule, the exemption we seek would allow authors to access Blu-ray content and would cover important fair uses beyond the narrow category of criticism and commentary in film analysis.

The hearings went well. The Copyright Office posed many questions early and often, but Michael and Bobette answered them ably, with assistance from their legal team of UCI Law student Aaron Benmark, CU Law student Molly Priya McClurg, CU Professor Blake Reid, and UCI Professor Jack Lerner. The debate revolved around several questions, including the scope of the proposed exemption and the necessity of High Definition footage in the modern multimedia e-book market. The hearing ran long, lasting about two hours and twenty minutes, and we were very glad to have the opportunity to answer all the Office’s questions and to provide additional information demonstrating why this exemption is so important to authors.

At the end of the day, we are confident that our efforts will help the Copyright Office recognize the fundamental realities at play in this proceeding:

  • As rightsholders, authors make responsible fair use, and we do so in many fields beyond film analysis (a limitation in the current exemption);
  • The modern e-book market demands HD footage and we need to access HD footage in order to make our fair use;
  • And finally, nothing in the exemption we propose carries any risk of harm to rightsholders. There has not been even a hint that the current exemption has led to copyright infringement—and there’s no reason to think that our proposed one will be any different.

We’ll know the result of the hearing in the fall, when the Register of Copyrights makes her final recommendation and the Librarian of Congress adopts a final rule. In the meantime, Authors Alliance will continue our work in support of authors who write to be read.

Join us on May 27 in Toronto!

Posted May 8, 2015

Original photograph by Joel Friesen, modified and used here under a CC BY 2.0 license.

Join Authors Alliance and the University of Toronto Libraries for a lively discussion of the opportunities and challenges the internet presents to both academic and independent authors. Topics will include the role of copyright law and fair dealing, new publishing opportunities (including open access publishing), and how digital dissemination can provide new life for older and out-of-print titles.

Following an introduction by Ariel Katz, University of Ottawa’s Michael Geist will moderate the panel, which features:

  • Ren Bucholz, Lawyer, Lenczner Slaght, LLP
  • Natalie Zemon Davis, Professor of History, University of Toronto
  • Joshua Gans, Professor of Strategic Management, University of Toronto
  • Ryan Merkley, CEO, Creative Commons
  • Margaret Jane Radin, Distinguished Research Scholar at the University of Toronto; Professor of Law, University of Michigan; Professor of Law, emerita, Stanford
  • Pamela Samuelson, Professor of Law and Information, University of California, Berkeley; Co-founder of Authors Alliance
  • Peter Unwin, Fiction Author and Poet

The event is free and open to the public. Registration is encouraged.

Books and the Valley of the Unassignable

Posted April 22, 2015

Authors Alliance Co-Founder Tom Leonard

In our day of networked information, scholars in North America need not worry about finding a book that bears on a crucial issue. Interlibrary loan has never been more efficient and Amazon and similar sites display single used books for sale. But here the good news ends, for there is often no way to assign this reading. A single volume cannot serve even the smallest seminar, because it cannot be shared in time for the day or week when it is the center of attention. Classes are planned months in advance and without the certainty of a book being available, it will not make the common reading list.

At Authors Alliance we had the impression that many important books in the humanities and qualitative social sciences were falling into the Valley of the Unassignable. But proceeding by anecdote would only take us so far, and so we ran a survey to see if older books that we knew were in demand, could be ordered from a publisher or otherwise were available as an e-book.

The University Library at Berkeley (which holds more than 12 million volumes and has 65,000 borrower cards) gave us a list of the 500 titles that were most frequently checked out in 2013-2014. Circulation figures of this type are imperfect, since some titles are on reserve and have to be checked out or renewed more frequently. But by looking at such a large number, we have corrected for this distortion. We cast a close eye on the nearly 200 titles that were heavily requested and fell into the humanities and qualitative social science.

Much credit should be given to publishers who have largely kept these valued titles in print and to others who have seen that there is at least a pdf of works published in the 20th century. But we could also see that Berkeley borrowers were checking out books that could not be assigned in a class. Market forces and rights issues limit what can be done for groups of readers. If we look at 20th century imprints and, rely on Amazon.com, many titles are out of reach. Consider for example:

Vladimir Putin Book Group

  • Paul W. Schroeder, Austria, Great Britain, and the Crimean War: the destruction of the European Concert (1973) [$110 on Kindle, $116 if Amazon restocks]
  • Winfried Baumgart, Imperialism: the idea and reality of British and French Colonial Expansion, 1880-1914 (1982)
  • Norman Rich, Why the Crimean War? A Cautionary Tale (1985)
  • David Wetzel, The Crimean War: A Diplomatic History (1985)
  • Rosemary Foot, The Wrong War: American Policy and the Dimensions of the Korean Conflict, 1950-1953 (1985)
  • James Cracraft, Major problems in the history of imperial Russia (1993-94) [some $100 paperbacks from Amazon]

Berkeley readers are checking these titles out, but Mr. Putin would struggle to put them on his reading list.

We can probably find a book group for you in our data, and that is unfortunate. Authors Alliance offers a way for many authors and their heirs to take works out of the Valley of the Unassignable. One path to higher ground was offered earlier this month, when we released a guide that helps authors regain rights to their books in order to make them more available.

Download Understanding Rights Reversions (PDF) from Authors Alliance
Download Understanding Rights Reversions from Unglue.it